- Opinion: Who Holds Control on Oil Price -Just These Three Men
- Africa Mining: Malawi importing 65,000 tons of coal per year
- Mozambique Oil & Gas: Anadarko to spend $200 million pre-FID on Mozambique LNG project
- Markets: Natural Gas Markets Remain Ultra Tight
- Africa Oil & Gas: South Sudan Says Recovering Oil Production Boosts FX Reserves
The expected growth in the global LNG market in the coming years will mean buyers can do without long-term contracts, leading industry players said late Tuesday at the Flame conference in Amsterdam.
Instead, with growing volumes of spot LNG available, buyers can either look to shorter-term contracts or the spot market to meet their needs.
Charif Souki, chairman at US LNG developer Tellurian Inc., said long-term contracts in the LNG sector would soon be a thing of the past.
“The market has become sufficiently liquid today that a buyer does not need to enter into a long-term contract,” Souki — who was the founder of US LNG pioneer Cheniere Energy — said.
He said that in the next two years, some 20 cargoes would be available every day on the spot market, or 5,000 cargoes a year. “You’re never very far from a cargo,” he said.
“There is no incentive, no imperative to have a long-term contract,” Souki said, unless a buyer is a large utility that needs the guarantee of supply.
“You have to prepare yourself for the next generation which is a transition to a true commodity business where you don’t need a long-term contract. With a 50 Bcf/d market, with LNG on the water, I doubt very much the necessity for long-term contracts is going to remain for much longer,” he said.
Tellurian is planning to build the 26 million mt/year Driftwood LNG plant and has tried different methods to market its capacity, including offering to sell its future LNG at a fixed $8/MMBtu price to Japanese buyers.
However, no companies took up the offer.
“We’ve tried fixed costs, variable costs, Henry Hub-plus, and now we’re trying to find a new business model,” Souki said.
COMMODITY ‘IN THE MAKING’
Mark Gyetvay, CFO of Russia’s Novatek, agreed that the long-term contract was coming under pressure, saying that Novatek was looking at a combination of different contract lengths to offer prospective buyers from its planned Arctic LNG-2 project.
These, he said, could include some spot, short-term and medium-term arrangements.
Total’s head of gas, Laurent Vivier, meanwhile, said the long-term contract could still have a role to play, but said that size was the crucial factor.
“LNG is a commodity ‘in the making’,” he said. “There could still be a need for long-term contracts to help finance new LNG projects.”
But, he said, a company needed to be global and have a big portfolio, and that final investment decisions for new projects depended on that visibility.
Only one FID on a new LNG supply project was taken in 2017 — Eni’s floating LNG project Coral in Mozambique — and none has been taken yet in 2018.
Andree Stracke, chief commercial officer at Germany’s RWE Supply & Trading, said his company would not be willing to take the risk of a long-term LNG import contract.
“A 10-year horizon is the most that we can risk manage,” Stracke said.
He also said optionality was a key consideration in contact negotiations, but that it is difficult to put a value on optionality in a contract.
Souki agreed, saying both sides wanted optionality so that sellers could try to optimize sales during high-price, high-demand periods, while buyers would look to offload their commitment when they didn’t need a cargo.
— Stuart Elliott, Stuart.Elliott@spglobal.com
— Edited by Jonathan Fox, email@example.com